On finite tame extensions of valued fields

Singh, Amrit Pal ; Khanduja, Sudesh K. (2005) On finite tame extensions of valued fields Communications in Algebra, 33 (4). pp. 1095-1105. ISSN 0092-7872

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/AGB-200...

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/AGB-200053817

Abstract

Let v be a henselian valuation of arbitrary rank of a field K and v¯ be its unique prolongation to a fixed algebraic closure K¯ of K. For any α belonging to K¯\K, let Δ K (α) (resp. ω K (α)) denote the invariants defined to be the minimum (resp. maximum) of the set {v¯(α − α’) | α’ ≠ α runs over K-conjugates of α}. In 1998, while correcting a result of James Ax, Khanduja proved that every finite extension of (K, v) contained in K¯ is tame, if and only if to each α ε K¯\K, there corresponds a ε K such that v¯(α − a) ≥ Δ K (α). It was also shown that the analogue of the above result does not hold in general when K¯ is replaced by a finite extension of K (see J. Alg. 201, 1998, pp. 647–655). In this paper, similar characterizations of finite tame extensions are given, and some of the invariants associated with such an extension are explicitly determined.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to Taylor and Francis Group.
Keywords:Non-Archimedean Valued Fields; Valuations and their Generalizations; Valued Fields
ID Code:69898
Deposited On:19 Nov 2011 11:11
Last Modified:19 Nov 2011 11:11

Repository Staff Only: item control page