Representability of Hom implies flatness

Nitsure, Nitin (2004) Representability of Hom implies flatness Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Mathematical Sciences, 114 (1). pp. 7-14. ISSN 0253-4142

[img]
Preview
PDF - Publisher Version
132kB

Official URL: http://www.ias.ac.in/mathsci/vol114/feb2004/Pm2241...

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02829667

Abstract

LetX be a projective scheme over a noetherian base scheme S, and let F be a coherent sheaf on X. For any coherent sheaf ε on X, consider the set-valued contravariant functor Hom(ε,F)S-schemes, defined by Hom(ε,F) (T)= Hom(εT ,FT) where εT and FT are the pull-backs of ε and F to XT =X xS T. A basic result of Grothendieck ([EGA], III 7.7.8, 7.7.9) says that ifF is flat over S then hom(ε,F) is representable for all ε. We prove the converse of the above, in fact, we show that ifL is a relatively ample line bundle onX over S such that the functor Hom(L -n ,F) is representable for infinitely many positive integersn, then F is flat over S. As a corollary, taking X =S, it follows that if F is a coherent sheaf on S then the functor T → H°(T, Ft) on the category of S-schemes is representable if and only ifF is locally free onS. This answers a question posed by Angelo Vistoli. The techniques we use involve the proof of flattening stratification, together with the methods used in proving the author's earlier result (see [N1]) that the automorphism group functor of a coherent sheaf onS is representable if and only if the sheaf is locally free.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to Indian Academy of Sciences.
Keywords:Flattening Stratification; Q-sheaf; Group-scheme; Base Change
ID Code:24800
Deposited On:30 Nov 2010 09:12
Last Modified:17 May 2016 08:24

Repository Staff Only: item control page