Sharma, Jyotsna ; Arora, Ramandeep Singh ; Trehan, A. ; Bakhshi, S. ; Hazarika, M. ; Verma, N. ; Malhotra, P. ; Tripathi, R. ; Majhi, I. ; Lowe, J. ; William, J. ; Bagai, P. ; Guilmoto, C. ; Arora, R.S. (2022) Diagnosis interval is the largest contributor to time to diagnosis and treatment for childhood cancer patients in India results of the InPOG-ACC-16-02 study Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal, 7 (4). S5. ISSN 2468-1245
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phoj.2022.10.246
Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phoj.2022.10.246
Abstract
Background: Outcomes of childhood cancer in low- and middle-income countries lag behind those in high-income countries with challenges to accessing healthcare. Little is known about the patient journey from the time of onset of symptoms to ultimately receiving treatment in India. This multi-center study addresses this. Methods: This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted across 69 centers (48% public, 26% private, 9% trust) in North and East India from 2019-2021. All newly diagnosed patients <18 years of age who commenced cancer-directed treatment were enrolled over a 12-month period. Information was gathered from the parent/carer using a questionnaire. Outcomes of interest were patient interval(PI) first symptom to a first healthcare provider(HCP) contact, diagnostic interval(DI) first HCP contact to diagnosis, treatment interval(TRI) diagnosis to start of treatment, the total time to diagnosis(TTD) - first symptom to diagnosis, and total time to treatment(TTT) - first symptom to start of treatment. Linear regression was used to explore the association of demographic, socio-economic, and disease variables with outcomes of interest. Results: 2234 patients (65% male, median age 6 years, 66.1% hematolymphoid cancers) were recruited. 53.6% of families were lower and upper-lower class (Kuppuswamy scale). The median (IQR) PI, DI, TRI, TTD, and TTT were 3(1-12), 37(14-85), 3(0-9), 38(22-101), and 57(27-113) days respectively. TTT varied significantly (p<0.05) with age (greatest 15-19 years), center type (greatest public sector), region (greatest North East), socio-economic status (greatest in the lowest socio-economic quintile), and type of cancer (greatest in bone and soft tissue sarcomas). The associations were similar for PI, DI, TRI, and TTD except that age was not a significant variable for PI. Conclusions: DI is the largest contributor to TTD and TTT for childhood cancer patients in India. Specific interventions for timely diagnosis by creating awareness and developing referral pathways are recommended to minimize delays.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Source: | Copyright of this article belongs to Elsevier Science. |
ID Code: | 138646 |
Deposited On: | 21 Aug 2025 08:02 |
Last Modified: | 21 Aug 2025 08:02 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page