Clinical and Prognostic Impact of Copy Number Alterations and Associated Risk Profiles in a Cohort of Pediatric B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cases Treated Under ICiCLe Protocol

Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar ; Singh, Minu ; Chandrashekar, Pragna H. ; Bakhshi, Sameer ; Trehan, Amita ; Gupta, Ritu ; Thakur, Rozy ; Gajendra, Smeeta ; Sharma, Preity ; Sreedharanunni, Sreejesh ; Sachdeva, Manupdesh S. ; Pushpam, Deepam ; Varma, Neelam ; Bansal, Deepak ; Jain, Richa ; Peyam, Srinivasan ; Moorman, Anthony V. ; Bhatia, Prateek (2022) Clinical and Prognostic Impact of Copy Number Alterations and Associated Risk Profiles in a Cohort of Pediatric B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cases Treated Under ICiCLe Protocol HemaSphere, 6 (10). e782. ISSN 2572-9241

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000782

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000782

Abstract

Copy number alteration (CNA) status and CNA risk profiles of IKZF1plus-, UK-ALL CNA risk groups and MRplus- scores, were evaluated for clinical and prognostic impact in a cohort of 493 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases diagnosed and treated under the Indian Collaborative Childhood Leukemia group (ICiCLe) protocol trial. Overall CNA frequency was 59% with 60% of cases showing 2-loci deletion. CDKN2A/B deletion was most common CNA (36.3%), while IKZF1 deletion and IKZF1plus- profile were noted in 19.5% and 13.4% of cases, respectively. IKZF1 deletions and other CNA risk profiles were significantly associated with poor (PR)/high risk (HR) clinical and genetic profile parameters (P < 0.001). In addition, the 3-year OS, event-free survival (EFS) was significantly poor with high relapse rate (RR) of 38.6%, 46.5%, and 35.2% for IKZF1 deletions, IKZF1plus profiles, and UK-ALL CNA-intermediate risk (IR)+PR risk groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Integrated evaluation of UK-ALL CNA risk profile with ICiCLe trial risk stratification groups revealed a worse overall survival, EFS, and RR of 63.3%, 43.2%, and 35.2% for CNA-IR+PR profile compared to CNA-good risk profile (81.3%, 65.0%, and 21.0%; P < 0.001). Hence, routine CNA testing in our setting is must to identify standard risk and IR cases likely to benefit from HR treatment.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to Hemasphere.
ID Code:137788
Deposited On:18 Aug 2025 11:26
Last Modified:18 Aug 2025 11:26

Repository Staff Only: item control page