Immune reconstitution syndrome in HIV: validating a case definition and identifying clinical predictors in persons initiating antiretroviral therapy

Robertson, Jaime ; Meier, Matthew ; Wall, Jennifer ; Ying, Jun ; Fichtenbaum, Carl J. (2006) Immune reconstitution syndrome in HIV: validating a case definition and identifying clinical predictors in persons initiating antiretroviral therapy Clinical Infectious Diseases, 42 (11). pp. 1639-1646. ISSN 1058-4838

[img]
Preview
PDF
150kB

Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/42/11/1639/28...

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/503903

Abstract

Background: Clinical deterioration after initiation of antiretroviral therapy may result from restored immunity. There is no standard clinical definition for immune reconstitution syndrome. The objectives of this study were to validate a proposed definition and to identify factors predictive of immune reconstitution syndrome. Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study from an academic university medical practice. Cases were matched to ⩾2 control subjects by CD4+ cell count at the time of initiation of antiretroviral therapy. Cases and “mock cases” were blindly reviewed by 2 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) experts. Results: Twenty possible cases of immune reconstitution syndrome were identified; HIV experts excluded all cases of herpes zoster (shingles), with agreement on real and mock cases of 92%. For 14 confirmed case patients (compared with 40 control subjects), immune reconstitution syndrome was associated with a higher number of prior opportunistic infections (P = .003) and higher CD8+ cell counts at baseline (P = .05) and at week 12 (P = .02). Immune reconstitution syndrome was associated with lower baseline levels of alanine aminotransferase (P = .05) and hemoglobin (P = .02). On multivariate analysis, the number of prior opportunistic infections (odds ratio, 2.7; P = .007) and lower hemoglobin level at baseline (odds ratio, 0.8; P = .003) were independently associated with development of immune reconstitution syndrome. A predictive model was defined by classification and regression tree analysis with a sensitivity and specificity of 78.57% and 87.50%, respectively, for an importance score of ⩾4 (on a scale of 0.0 to 100.0), and 92.86% and 80.00%, respectively, for a score of ⩾2, using the number of prior opportunistic infections, CD8+ cell count, and hemoglobin level. Conclusions: A standard definition for immune reconstitution syndrome is possible. Patients with a greater severity of illness at initiation of antiretroviral therapy are at risk for immune reconstitution syndrome. The model defined by classification and regression tree analysis may provide a basis for risk stratification before initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to Oxford University Press.
ID Code:110589
Deposited On:01 Sep 2017 09:07
Last Modified:01 Sep 2017 09:07

Repository Staff Only: item control page