Paul, Vinod K. (1994) Assessment of clinical competence of undergraduate medical students Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 61 (2). pp. 145-151. ISSN 0019-5456
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02843...
Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02843605
Abstract
The assessment is a key determinant of learning by the students. Validity, reliability, objectivity and practicability are the fundamental attributes of assessment. It is important to understand how a given tool of assessment fares on these criteria. The conventional practical clinical examination consisting of “long”/“short” cases lacks objectivity and reliability. It also has a limited validity because sufficient sampling is not possible. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), on the other hand, is a comprehensive, reliable and objective test, but does not take a holistic view of the patient. Viva-voce often revolves around theory and is highly subjective. Since no single tool of assessment of clinical competence is ideal, a combination of “long”/“short” case (s) with OSCE is suggested as a more rational examination.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Source: | Copyright of this article belongs to Springer Verlag. |
Keywords: | Clinical Competence; Objective Test |
ID Code: | 104070 |
Deposited On: | 08 Dec 2017 09:43 |
Last Modified: | 08 Dec 2017 09:43 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page