Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of detectors: coherent versus coincident strategies

Mukhopadhyay, Himan ; Sago, Norichika ; Tagoshi, Hideyuki ; Dhurandhar, Sanjeev ; Takahashi, Hirotaka ; Kanda, Nobuyuki (2006) Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of detectors: coherent versus coincident strategies Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 74 (8). 083005_1-083005_17. ISSN 1550-7998

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v74/i8/e083005

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083005

Abstract

We compare two strategies of multidetector detection of compact binary inspiral signals, namely, the coincidence and the coherent. For simplicity we consider here two identical detectors having the same power spectral density of noise, that of initial LIGO, located in the same place and having the same orientation. We consider the cases of independent noise as well as that of correlated noise. The coincident strategy involves separately making two candidate event lists, one for each detector, and from these choosing those pairs of events from the two lists which lie within a suitable parameter window, which then are called coincidence detections. The coherent strategy on the other hand involves combining the data phase coherently, so as to obtain a single network statistic which is then compared with a single threshold. Here we attempt to shed light on the question as to which strategy is better. We compare the performances of the two methods by plotting the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for the two strategies. Several of the results are obtained analytically in order to gain insight. Further we perform numerical simulations in order to determine certain parameters in the analytic formulae and thus obtain the final complete results. We consider here several cases from the relatively simple to the astrophysically more relevant in order to establish our results. The bottom line is that the coherent strategy although more computationally expensive in general than the coincidence strategy, is superior to the coincidence strategy-considerably less false dismissal probability for the same false alarm probability in the viable false alarm regime.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to The American Physical Society.
ID Code:87742
Deposited On:21 Mar 2012 09:58
Last Modified:21 Mar 2012 09:58

Repository Staff Only: item control page