Staying in the club: Exploring criteria governing metacommunity membership for obligate symbionts under host–symbiont feedback

Abstract

Metacommunity membership is influenced by habitat availability and trophic requirements. However, for multitrophic horizontally transmitted symbiont communities that are closely associated with hosts, symbiont–host interactions may affect membership criteria in novel ways. For example, failure of beneficial services from symbionts could influence the host, and in turn, the entire community. Understanding such host–symbiont feedback effects on symbiont community membership, symbiont community structure, and function is important for understanding if host–symbiont communities are fundamentally different from more traditional ecological communities. We investigate the membership criteria for a multitrophic insect symbiont community that colonizes host inflorescences at specific developmental stages termed colonization windows. The inflorescences serve as microcosm habitats. Symbionts exhibit a range of interactions from mutualism to parasitism. Hosts exhibit feedback by aborting inflorescences not pollinated by mutualistic symbionts. Habitats are consequently lost for all other symbiont species in such host-derived organs whose development is mutualist-dependent. Using empirical measurements to characterize inflorescence development, we simulate symbiont dispersal colonization across hosts. We vary host densities and lengths of symbiont colonization windows, and track the persistence of each symbiont species in the metacommunity based on its trophic requirements and resource availability within the microcosm. Since the persistence of the microcosm habitat is dictated by pollination performed by the mutualist, the mutualist fared better than all other symbionts. The length of symbiont colonization windows was positively related with colonization success and symbiont persistence. The cumulative length of the colonization windows of prey dictated predator success; diet breadth or prey colonization success did not influence predator persistence. Predators also had a greater host-plant density requirement than prey for persistence in the community. These results offer valuable insights into host densities required for maintaining symbionts, and have implications for multitrophic symbiont community stability. Special constraints can govern symbiont community membership, function and structure and symbiont persistence when host–symbiont feedback impacts host microcosm development.