Are Short Proofs Narrow? QBF Resolution Is Not So Simple

Beyersdorff, Olaf ; Chew, Leroy ; Mahajan, Meena ; Shukla, Anil (2018) Are Short Proofs Narrow? QBF Resolution Is Not So Simple ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 19 (1). pp. 1-26. ISSN 1529-3785

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://doi.org/10.1145/3157053

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3157053

Abstract

Viewing the computation of the determinant and the permanent of integer matrices as combinatorial problems on associated graphs, we explore the restrictiveness of planarity on their complexities and show that both problems remain as hard as in the general case, that is, GapL- and P- complete. On the other hand, both bipartite planarity and bimodal planarity bring the complexity of permanents down (but no further) to that of determinants. The permanent or the determinant modulo 2 is complete for ⊕L, and we show that parity of paths in a layered grid graph (which is bimodal planar) is also complete for this class. We also relate the complexity of grid graph reachability to that of testing existence/uniqueness of a perfect matching in a planar bipartite graph.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to ACM.
ID Code:127988
Deposited On:14 Oct 2022 11:31
Last Modified:14 Oct 2022 11:31

Repository Staff Only: item control page