Tautomeric preferences and electron delocalization in biurets, thiobiurets, and dithiobiurets: An ab initio study

Adane, Legesse ; Bharatam, Prasad V. (2008) Tautomeric preferences and electron delocalization in biurets, thiobiurets, and dithiobiurets: An ab initio study International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 108 (7). pp. 1277-1286. ISSN 0020-7608

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://doi.org/10.1002/qua.21629

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qua.21629

Abstract

In several literature reports biuret and its sulfur analogs are reported to exist in their diketo form with general formula H2NCXNHCYNH2 (X = O, Y = O, biuret; X = Y = S, dithiobiuret; and X = O, Y = S, thiobiuret). On the other hand, recently reported results on the electronic structure of biguanide analogs (X = Y = NH)demonstrated that a form equivalent to diketo is not the preferred structure. Thus, a systematic ab initio study on the tautomeric preferences of biuret and its sulfur analogs (dithiobiuret and thiobiuret) has been carried out. The results indicate that an interplay of conjugative stabilization and intramolecular hydrogen bonding to play a role in tautomeric preferences. Energy and geometric parameters, natural bond orbital analyses have been employed to understand the chemistry of the title compounds. The results indicate that unlike biguanides, these compounds prefer diketo forms containing hydrogen on the bridging nitrogen (N4) and in a trans‐arrangement (1a–4a). However, tautomerization of these keto forms to the corresponding enol isomers was also found to be highly probable. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords:Biurets; Tautomeric Preferences; Π‐electron Delocalization and H‐shift.
ID Code:116593
Deposited On:12 Apr 2021 10:17
Last Modified:12 Apr 2021 10:17

Repository Staff Only: item control page