A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 MW 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake

Hough, Susan E. ; Martin, Stacey S. ; Gahalaut, Vineet ; Joshi, Anand ; Landes, M. ; Bossu, R. (2016) A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 MW 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake Natural Hazards, 84 (3). pp. 1661-1684. ISSN 0921-030X

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069-0...

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8


We use 21 strong motion recordings from Nepal and India for the 25 April 2015 moment magnitude (MW) 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake together with the extensive macroseismic intensity data set presented by Martin et al. (Seism Res Lett 87:957–962, 2015) to analyse the distribution of ground motions at near-field and regional distances. We show that the data are consistent with the instrumental peak ground acceleration (PGA) versus macroseismic intensity relationship developed by Worden et al. (Bull Seism Soc Am 102:204–221, 2012), and use this relationship to estimate peak ground acceleration from intensities (PGAEMS). For nearest-fault distances (RRUP < 200 km), PGAEMS is consistent with the Atkinson and Boore (Bull Seism Soc Am 93:1703–1729, 2003) subduction zone ground motion prediction equation (GMPE). At greater distances (RRUP > 200 km), instrumental PGA values are consistent with this GMPE, while PGAEMS is systematically higher. We suggest the latter reflects a duration effect whereby effects of weak shaking are enhanced by long-duration and/or long-period ground motions from a large event at regional distances. We use PGAEMS values within 200 km to investigate the variability of high-frequency ground motions using the Atkinson and Boore (Bull Seism Soc Am 93:1703–1729, 2003) GMPE as a baseline. Across the near-field region, PGAEMS is higher by a factor of 2.0–2.5 towards the northern, down-dip edge of the rupture compared to the near-field region nearer to the southern, up-dip edge of the rupture. Inferred deamplification in the deepest part of the Kathmandu valley supports the conclusion that former lake-bed sediments experienced a pervasive nonlinear response during the mainshock (Dixit et al. in Seismol Res Lett 86(6):1533–1539, 2015; Rajaure et al. in Tectonophysics, 2016. Ground motions were significantly amplified in the southern Gangetic basin, but were relatively low in the northern basin. The overall distribution of ground motions and damage during the Gorkha earthquake thus reflects a combination of complex source, path, and site effects. We also present a macroseismic intensity data set and analysis of ground motions for the MW 7.3 Dolakha aftershock on 12 May 2015, which we compare to the Gorkha mainshock and conclude was likely a high stress-drop event.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to Springer Verlag.
Keywords:Gorkha; Nepal; Earthquake; Ground Motions
ID Code:112754
Deposited On:07 Jun 2018 06:38
Last Modified:07 Jun 2018 06:38

Repository Staff Only: item control page