Back electron transfer from TiO2 nanoparticles to FeIII(CN)63-: origin of non-single-exponential and particle size independent dynamics

Weng, Yu-Xiang ; Wang, Yong-Qiang ; Asbury, John B. ; Ghosh, Hiren N. ; Lian, Tianquan (1999) Back electron transfer from TiO2 nanoparticles to FeIII(CN)63-: origin of non-single-exponential and particle size independent dynamics The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 104 (1). pp. 93-104. ISSN 1520-6106

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp992522a

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp992522a

Abstract

Back-electron-transfer (ET) dynamics in FeII(CN)64--sensitized colloidal TiO2 nanoparticles are studied using ultrafast pump probe spectroscopy. Excitation of the adsorbate-to-nanoparticle charge-transfer band at 400 nm leads to direct injection of electrons from FeII(CN)64- to TiO2. The kinetics of back electron transfer from TiO2 to the FeIII(CN)63- are measured by monitoring the bleach recovery of the charge-transfer band in the 430−600 nm region. The measured back-ET kinetics are non-single-exponential, and a multiexponential fit requires at least four components on the <1 ns time scale. The kinetics are independent of pump power, indicating a geminate recombination process. Recombination kinetics are very similar in two samples of 5 and 11 nm (A-type) particles prepared from dried nanoparticle powder, but they are noticeably different from those in samples of 3 and 9 nm (B-type) nanoparticles prepared directly from colloids without drying. This result indicates that the back-ET kinetics in this system are more influenced by the surface properties of the nanoparticles than their sizes. Two models with different distributions of trapped electrons are used to describe the back-ET kinetics. Model I assumes a homogeneous distribution of electrons on the surface of the entire particle. This model predicts a large particle size dependence and cannot fit the observed kinetics. Model II assumes a more localized distribution of injected electrons and takes account of relaxation from shallow to deep trap states during the recombination process. This model can fit the back-ET kinetics with three fitting parameters. According to this model, the injected electrons are trapped near the adsorbate, which accounts for the size independent back-ET kinetics. This model also predicts that trapped electrons at longer distance and/or larger trap energy recombine slower. A distribution of distance and trap energy as well as relaxation between trap states give rise to multiexponential back-ET kinetics.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to American Chemical Society.
ID Code:101624
Deposited On:01 Feb 2017 12:01
Last Modified:01 Feb 2017 12:01

Repository Staff Only: item control page