Comparison of short-course multidrug treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

Sundar, Shyam ; Sinha, Prabhat Kumar ; Rai, Madhukar ; Verma, Deepak Kumar ; Nawin, Kumar ; Alam, Shanawwaj ; Chakravarty, Jaya ; Vaillant, Michel ; Verma, Neena ; Pandey, Krishna ; Kumari, Poonam ; Lal, Chandra Shekhar ; Arora, Rakesh ; Sharma, Bhawna ; Ellis, Sally ; Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie ; Balasegaram, Manica ; Olliaro, Piero ; Das, Pradeep ; Modabber , Farrokh (2011) Comparison of short-course multidrug treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial The Lancet, 377 (9764). pp. 477-486. ISSN 0140-6736

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/P...

Related URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62050-8

Abstract

Background: Improved treatment approaches are needed for visceral leishmaniasis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of three potential short-course combination treatments compared with the standard monotherapy in India. Methods: Standard treatment (1 mg/kg amphotericin B infusion on alternate days for 30 days, total dose 15 mg/kg) was compared with three drug combinations (single injection of 5 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B and 7-day 50 mg oral miltefosine or single 10-day 11 mg/kg intramuscular paromomycin; or 10 days each of miltefosine and paromomycin) in an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in two hospital sites in Bihar, India. Patients aged 5-60 years with parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned one of the four treatments by the trial statistician by use of a computer-generated list. Clinical assessments were done at the end of treatment (15 days on combination treatment; 31 days for standard treatment) and after 45 days and 6 months. The primary endpoint was definitive cure (defined as no sign or symptom of visceral leishmaniasis and parasitologically cured to the last follow-up). Analyses were done both by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00696969. Findings: Between June, 2008, and July, 2009, 634 patients were assigned amphotericin B (n=157), liposomal amphotericin B with miltefosine (n=160) or paromomycin (n=158), or miltefosine and paromomycin (n=159). 618 patients were in the per-protocol population. There were two relapses in each group. The numbers with definitive cure at 6 months for the intention-to-treat population were 146 (cure rate 93.0%; CI 87·5 - 96·3) for amphotericin B, 156 (97·5%; 93·3 - 99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, 154 (97·5%; 93·24-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and paromomycin, and 157 (98·7%; 95·1 - 99·8) for miltefosine and paromomycin. All combinations were non-inferior to the standard treatment, in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Patients in the combination groups had fewer adverse events than did those assigned standard treatment. Interpretation: Combination treatments for visceral leishmaniasis are efficacious and safe, and decrease the duration of therapy, thereby encouraging adherence and reducing emergence of drug-resistant parasites.

Item Type:Article
Source:Copyright of this article belongs to The Lancet.
ID Code:71341
Deposited On:25 Nov 2011 12:54
Last Modified:25 Nov 2011 12:54

Repository Staff Only: item control page